Language in Political Economy and Market Economy: A Case Study of India

E. Annamalai

Abstract


The political philosophy underpinning the Indian Constitution is socialist economy in a multilingual political landscape. The Constitution grants some fundamental rights to all citizens regarding language and to linguistic and other minorities regarding education. It also obligates states to use many languages in school education. Restructuring the economy with free market as its pivot and the growing dominance of English in the information driven global economy give rise to policy changes in language use in education, which undermine the Constitutional provisions relating to language, though these changes reflect the manufactured consent of the citizens. This is made possible by the way the Constitution is interpreted by courts with regard to the fundamental rights of equality and non-discrimination when they apply to language. The unique property of language that it can be acquired, unlike other primordial attributes such as ethnicity or caste, comes into play in this interpretation. The result is that the law of the market takes over the law of the land.

Cite as: Annamalai, JLL 1 (2012), 50–62, DOI: 10.14762/jll.2012.050


Full Text:

PDF

References


Annamalai, E. 1999. Language Choice in Education: Conflict Resolution in Indian Courts. Language Science 20:1

Annamalai, E. 2003. Medium of Power: The Question of English in India. In Tollefson, James W. and Tsui, Amy B.M. (eds.) Medium of Education Policies: Whose Agenda? Which Agenda? Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum

Annamalai, E. 2003a. Nation Building in a Globalized World: Language Choice in Education in India. In Lin, Angel M.Y. and Martin, Peter W. (eds.) Globalization, De/Neo Colonization and Language in Education: Policies and Practices. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Annamalai, E. 2004. Equalizing Access to English in Education and Balancing Multilingualism in India. In Dheram, Premakumari (ed.) Negotiating Empowerment: Studies in English Language and Education. Hyderabad: Orient Longman

Annamalai, E. 2010. The Politics of Language in India. In Brass, Paul (ed.) Handbook of South Asian Politics. London: Routledge.

Awasthi. S. K. (ed.). 2004. The Constitution of India (as amended by the

Constitution (Ninetieth Amendment) Act, 2003). Allahabad: Dwivedi. Third Edition. Accessible at http://indiacode.nic.in/coiweb/welcome.html

Govt. of India. 2009. Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act. New Delhi: Govt. of India. Accessible at http://www.india.gov.in/allimpfrms/allacts/3119.pdf

Graddol, David. 2010. English Next – India. New Delhi: British Council. Accessible at http://www.britishcouncil.org/learning-english-next-india-2010-book.htm

Moilshree. 2006. Minority Educational Institutions

Pitroda, Sam (ed.). 2008. Towards a Knowledge Society: Three Years of National Knowledge Commission. New Delhi: National Knowledge Commission. Accessible at http://www.knowledgecommission.gov.in/downloads/documents/towards_knowledgesociety.pdf

Siddiqui, M.S.A. (ed.). n.d. Guidelines for determination of Minority Status, Recognition,Affiliation and related matters in respect of Minority Educational Institutions under the Constitution of India. New Delhi: National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions. Accessible at http://ncmei.gov.in/writereaddata/filelinks/c296efcb_Guidelines.pdf

Swamy, Maheshwara, N. 2003. Supreme Court Safeguards to Educational

Institutions. Hyderabad: Asia Law House. Unpublished Research Report

Yash Pal (ed.). 2005. National Curriculum Framework. New Delhi: National Council of Educational Research and Training. Accessible at http://www.ncert.nic.in/html/pdf/schoolcurriculum/framework05/prelims.pdf




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14762/jll.2012.050

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2012 E. Annamalai

License URL: http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/dppl/DPPL_v2_en_06-2004.html